Cele|bitchy |
- Elisabetta Canalis is papped in Berlin with Mehcad Brooks: give us a break?
- Linnocent was offered $1 million for a mold of her ginger biscuits
- Duchess Kate does not wear a busted weave, she just has a scalp scar
- Why is Ashton Kutcher acting like he’s the victim?
- Lady Gaga “loves pitting men against each other, feeling worshipped”
- Kate Gosselin is giving her kids singing & acting lessons, plans to move to Los Angeles
- Matt Bellamy’s bandmates hate Kate Hudson, call her “Yoko”
- Kristen Stewart on Glamour UK, “I’m kind of repulsed by jocks from anywhere”
- Is Frances Bean Cobain engaged to a Kurt Cobain lookalike?
- Sandra Bullock in gold & black for amfAR event: adorable or underdone?
| Elisabetta Canalis is papped in Berlin with Mehcad Brooks: give us a break? Posted: 28 Oct 2011 08:56 AM PDT
Anyway these two were in Berlin. I’m in the states now but I lived in Berlin for about four years and I was there all summer. They did the tourist thing in Mitte, and they were photographed by someone they undoubtedly called ahead of time, because no one would even know who they are in Berlin or particularly care. Elisabetta is still trying to be famous, and again at least she is with a guy who is either also using her to be famous too and/or genuinely likes being around her. You would expect her to go for another bigwig. As I mentioned before, my opinion of Brooks (who we did feature on HGF like three times, I know some of you will ask!) has diminished after this news. BUT he does look happy with Elisabetta, and he looks just as thrilled to get papped as she is. They look like a real couple. What is he doing with his hand in her face though? He’s like going “pow! hahah!” It’s weird. Would she take Clooney back in a heartbeat though? Probably, although she may realize that ship has passed. She’s not waiting around for him, and she sure wants us to know it.           Photo credit: WENN.com      |
| Linnocent was offered $1 million for a mold of her ginger biscuits Posted: 28 Oct 2011 08:44 AM PDT When I read the first sentence of this TMZ story, I felt the vom rising up. The sentence begins, "Lindsay Lohan’s genitals are a friggin’ gold mine…" VOM. Only wouldn't it be more accurate if Linnocent's genitals were a "copper" mine? Because she's a ginger, you know. Copper. Ginge. Firecrotch. Her biscuits look like a cool autumn day in the mountains, the shades of red blanketing the landscape. With scabies. Anyway, TMZ reports that in addition to her six-figure Playboy deal (which includes everything, the full ginge), an "adult entertainment company" is also willing to pay ONE MILLION DOLLARS… just for a mold of LL's "lady parts".
[From TMZ] LMAO, “She would never accept such an offer for any amount of money.” Like she has such high standards! Like Linnocent is sitting around, fielding all of this amazing offers. "No, I don't get on my knees for less than $100 grand! Call back when you're ready to make a real offer. Hello, yes? A mold of my what? Ten million or I'll give you a mold of my middle finger!" Honestly though… if I was faced with the decision between posing (tastefully) nude in Playboy for someodd $900K, or having a mold of my vadge made for $1 million, I think I would choose the mold. Right? It feels less creepy, honestly. But if I was Linnocent, I would do both. Oh, and Star Mag had this sketchy story about the real reason LL isn’t going to be sent to jail - according to a “source,” “Lindsay has managed to form a friendship with a powerful political type. He’s promised her he’ll help get her out of trouble ASAP… the new friend has put her fears at bay and is offering her hope of getting the whole incident squashed.” Er… it’s Boehner, right? Weiner? Rick Perry! Oh, and here are photos of LL from two days ago, where she brought two purses to the morgue (one purse for drugs, I'm assuming). One of the purses is a $4500 Fendi, and the other is a $1600 YSL. Of course. Photos courtesy of WENN and Pacific Coast News.    |
| Duchess Kate does not wear a busted weave, she just has a scalp scar Posted: 28 Oct 2011 08:43 AM PDT First things first: the dress that the Duchess of Cambridge wore for her first solo, royal event was Amanda Wakeley. Why did it take hours to get the designer ID straight? I don't know. I still really like the dress on Kate, although I'm sure she was criticized in some hoity-toity corridors for showing so much skin. But as some of you pointed out, Kate pulls it off because she's so slim and because she barely has much of a bust. If you gave this dress to Sofia Vergara, it would be obscene (and awesome, in a completely different way). Now, in yesterday's post, I mentioned that The Mail was getting all tabloidy over the state of Kate's hair. Specifically, the "line" that could be seen just centimeters from her hairline, in her hair: The Mail claimed that the line was likely proof that the Duchess wears a weave or some kind of clip-on extensions. The story was widely circulated until the "spokesman for the Duchess" (fancy!) got in a snit and released the information that Kate has an old scar on her head, and that was what everyone was seeing:
[From Us Weekly] A serious operation that no one can talk about? WTF? Skip the jokes about The Omen and how Kate had a "666" birthmark removed. Let's face it, she's too lazy to be the devil. Which brings me to another question - Kate now has a spokesperson? I thought all of her staff and William's staff were technically employees of Prince Charles? But that's a little detail that keeps changing and revising too. Of course Kate has her own spokesman. Just like she probably has several assistants, dressers, stylists, secretaries and other assorted staffers. But if anyone comes out and admits that Kate already has a huge staff at her disposal, questions will arise: WHY? Why does she need so many people working for her at this moment when she barely does anything? Photos courtesy of Fame.    |
| Why is Ashton Kutcher acting like he’s the victim? Posted: 28 Oct 2011 08:39 AM PDT I was giving these Ashton Kutcher photos the side-eye yesterday, but I ended up not covering them. Mostly because I was feeling very punky, and I had to go to the doctor, but also because I absolutely loathe Ashton Kutcher at this point, and even looking at his dumb face fills me with rage. Anyway… Two nights ago, Ashton was at the GQ Magazine Gentleman's Ball. He went solo, because… I guess he couldn't convince Demi Moore to come with him? Because it's too soon for her to walk a red carpet with him, even though most of think she's not going to leave him for his wandering dong? His date that night was Rabbi Philip Berg, the Kabbalah dude, and Ashton was wearing his wedding ring. Here's Us Weekly's take on the evening:
[From Us Weekly] Page Six had a different take on Ashton's appearance - they claim Ashton "appeared emotional as he delivered a rambling speech, fighting back tears when he spoke of his fight against sex trafficking. He even managed to incomprehensibly weave in Moammar Khadafy's death, his study of the Old Testament, social networking, global violence, the sloppy wool hat he was wearing and the Chicago Bears." Just another sad day in the sad life of The Hot Tube Boner. Gross. Here's an honest-to-God question: why is Ashton Kutcher acting like HE is the victim in this situation? Like we're all just being so MEAN to him because he boned some club girl in a hot tub on his anniversary. He's such a child. Photos courtesy of WENN.    |
| Lady Gaga “loves pitting men against each other, feeling worshipped” Posted: 28 Oct 2011 08:10 AM PDT I always have to give Lady Gaga credit for putting a lot of thought and effort into her dealings with the press. Not just in interviews, but in simple press conferences too, Lady Gaga takes pains to deliver noteworthy moments so that the press corps has something to write about. Take these new photos of Gaga in New Dehli, India earlier today. She's going to be performing in New Dehli at an after-party shoe for India's Formula 1 debut. It's a big deal, sure, but she didn't need to make the press conference this kind of big deal, with the debut of a new multi-colored wig and a giant ball gown and a temporary tattoo in what looks like Sanskrit. I think she's sitting on a throne, and she might be wearing real diamonds too. Also: she looks really puffy, right? Coke bloat? Or just weight gain? Radar also has a story about PETA's Indian activists who are trying to convince Gaga to do a special "vegetarian" meat dress for her appearance in a country with hundreds of millions of vegetarians:
[From Radar] Blah. That's pretty boring. Luckily, Star Magazine has a much more interesting story about Gaga's love life. Apparently, she's still boning Tayloy Kinney, that hottie from her "You & I" video. Star claims that Kinney has moved in with Gaga, but there's trouble because Gaga is still casually seeing Ol' Luc Carl. A source tells the mag, "She feels Taylor loved the real her. She's given him the keys to her sprawling homes on both coasts, and if he's not working, he's with her. But… Gaga is still talking to and seeing Luc. They're not over." Why is doing this? Because, the source claims, "She loves pitting men against each other, feeling worshipped. She's always messing with people's hearts." Um, srsly? Taylor is a hot piece, Luc is a scummy douche. It really is that simple. Still, the "source" believes that Taylor is just a phase and that Gaga will end up back with Luc. Photos courtesy of WENN.    |
| Kate Gosselin is giving her kids singing & acting lessons, plans to move to Los Angeles Posted: 28 Oct 2011 08:07 AM PDT
[From The National Enquirer, print edition, November 7, 2011] I don’t doubt this story at all. Kate will put Courtney Stodden and Lindsay Lohan’s momagers to shame. She’ll mess up her kids more than any momager that came before her. At least she’ll be paying attention to them for a little while as she tries to train them up, though. Mommy needs some new hair extensions and money to pay her married boyfriend to stick around. It’s not like anyone is going to hire her, so she has to pimp out her kids.    |
| Matt Bellamy’s bandmates hate Kate Hudson, call her “Yoko” Posted: 28 Oct 2011 07:38 AM PDT All things considered, I really shouldn’t like Kate Hudson that much. Her Hollywood acting career has consisted of one decent performance that could probably be attributed more to Cameron Crowe’s directing skills than any true talent on her part; and she’s coasted upon the goodwill from Almost Famous to make many millions of dollars from a deluge of insipid romantic comedies. Of course, she probably also got her start in acting thanks to her famous mother and father figure too, so there’s a great deal of nepotism at work. On some level though, I admire that Kate just doesn’t give a crap what people think. She makes the movies that pay her the most, dates a continual stream of eligible bachelors (some grubbier than others), and gives us all the metaphorical finger in the process. I can sort of respect that Kate lives her life the way she wants to even though her alleged potential seems so wasted. However, Kate has not managed to charm everyone with her ways, and The Enquirer reports that the bandmates of her latest man (and baby dady), Matt Bellamy, absolutely detest Kate’s very existence as a rock groupie of sorts:
[From Enquirer, print edition, November 7, 2011] I can sort of buy that Kate would think she’s a “musical expert” after previously being married to a rock musician for several years, but she’s a bloody actress, and not a very good one at that. If she’s truly breathing down the band’s collective neck at rehearsals, maybe she should stay home and let them do their business. Then again, if Bellamy is writing lyrics that are about her that could be interpreted as unflattering, well, maybe she has a right to say something, but that’s the extent of it. And I doubt that Bellamy would say anything bad about his woman because he knows, just as well as everyone else, that he’s dating a serial monogamist. Bellamy is very easily replaceable in Kate’s life, so writing lyrics that compared her hair to freshly harvested corn husks would be a very stupid thing to do. On the other hand, the “Yoko” comparisons are out of line and are likely spawned from frustration, but that doesn’t make them any better. While I’m sure that the Muse guys would prefer Bellamy to stick around and be funky with them for hours instead of heading home to help with the baby, calling a woman “Yoko” won’t work progress in any shape or form. It will only make Bellamy angry in the long run. I recall Trent Reznor’s fangirls referring to his wife, Mariqueen Maandig, as the Yoko of NIN, which was pretty unjustified as well, since Reznor had announced his intention to shelve NIN long before Mariqueen came into the picture. As for the implication that, somehow, Matt Bellamy is equal to John Lennon — whatever. Muse might be popular with the kiddies, but they’re certainly not the modern-day incarnation of The Beatles. By the way, this guy isn’t exactly upset at being photographed by the paparazzi, right? He actually seems positively chuffed by the prospect. Photos courtesy of Fame        |
| Kristen Stewart on Glamour UK, “I’m kind of repulsed by jocks from anywhere” Posted: 28 Oct 2011 07:38 AM PDT Kristen Stewart covers the December issue of Glamour UK, all to promote Part I of Breaking Dawn. Most of the interview is Kristen discussing the film and there's very little of her talking about subjects that are often tricky for her - like the paparazzi, or her education (and lack there of) or whether Sparkles is officially her boyfriend. Kristen still curses up a blue streak in this interview (just like her GQ UK piece), but this is one of the friendlier pieces I've ever read with Kristen - meaning she came across as open, not so twitchy, and like she's a reasonably well-adjusted young woman. Here are some highlights from the interview:
I imagine she does like it better in England - there are so rarely new photos of her, and she probably is able to keep a lower profile, for whatever reason. I also like her admission about how she used to try so hard to be "not fake" in interviews. I would argue that she's still that girl, though, but she is improving. Oh, and "repulsed by jocks"? Repulsed? Seriously? That's a sweeping generalization. Glamour UK photos courtesy of ONTD.    |
| Is Frances Bean Cobain engaged to a Kurt Cobain lookalike? Posted: 28 Oct 2011 07:11 AM PDT
[From People] She’s so young to get married but at least Frances is in a serious longterm relationship and at least she’s no longer under the influence of her mom. The last we saw of Frances she was in a photoshoot late this summer looking so elegant and like a young Angelina Jolie. She is rock royalty, and it seems so fitting that she would marry a musician. I hope that they don’t do it legally, though, and just keep it serious and committed without making it official. I know some people marry young and it works, but I still think it’s a bad idea. They’re so adorable together, though. Check out these photos from their Facebook. (The black and white ones below.) Some photos credit: WENN.com    |
| Sandra Bullock in gold & black for amfAR event: adorable or underdone? Posted: 28 Oct 2011 06:28 AM PDT I feel like designers these days take the easy way out by making too many dresses that are either sleeveless or strapless. Whatever happened to the elegant sleeved gown or cocktail dress? Whatever happened to making weather-appropriate dresses for ladies, so they don't have to add layers to something cute, just so they won't freeze their asses off? That was my thought when I was looking through these photos of Sandra Bullock at last night's amfAR Inspiration Gala. I would love to see Sandra's little gold dress on its own, but I fear that it probably has spaghetti straps, so Sandra paired it with this tuxedo jacket. I don't hate the jacket-over-cocktail-dress trend, but I'm just saying, it's sad that there needs to be a trend for that. Designers should make more dresses with sleeves. Sandra's date was Kevin Huvane, an agent with CAA (and brother of Stephen Huvane, who represents Aniston and the like). Huvane purchased a Warhol at the auction event - but he bought it for Sandra's son!
[From Us Weekly] That was nice of her agents. Baby's first Warhol! Must be nice. And it was great that Sandra was on hand to honor Elizabeth Taylor too! There were photos of Colin Farrell leaving the event as well - but I guess he didn't do the red carpet. He was probably just there for Elizabeth, his dear friend (he spoke at her funeral too). Photos courtesy of WENN.    |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
