Cele|bitchy |
- Kim Kardashian to Jon Hamm: “We’re all working hard & have to respect one another”
- Michael Lohan threatens bodily harm to porn star who claims Lindsay paid for sex
- Star: Jennifer Lopez’s “gut” is telling her to marry Casper Smart in Mexico
- Katie Holmes takes pajama-clad Suri out to dinner in New York
- Ray J has ‘a ton of sexually explicit photos and videos’ of Whitney Houston, ruh oh
- Robert DeNiro’s “joke” at Michelle Obama’s fundraiser causes controversy
- Madonna’s new music video for “Girl Gone Wild”: tragic, interesting or just boring?
- Jennifer Lawrence shows off her assets in Calvin Klein: beautiful or tacky?
- Us Weekly: Reese Witherspoon is 12-weeks pregnant with her third child
- Emma Watson left university again, this time to work with Sofia Coppola
| Kim Kardashian to Jon Hamm: “We’re all working hard & have to respect one another” Posted: 21 Mar 2012 09:27 AM PDT Two days ago, Jon Hamm appeared on the Today Show to promote Mad Men with some of his castmates. In the course of the discussion, Matt Lauer asked The Hamm about his recent comments regarding the celebration, promotion and rewarding of "incuriousness" as seen in (Hamm's words) "f–king idiots" like Kim Kardashian and Paris Hilton. While Paris still hasn't breathed a word about Jon's comments, Ol' Kat-face tried to hitch her ass to Hamm and idiotically call him out for being "careless" in his wording. The Hamm initially responded by basically saying, "Nothing personal or anything, but yeah, that sh-t still stands" (in so many words). Then on Today he went even further by saying:
[The Hamm being awesome] So of course Kim Kardashian had to respond. Again. She called into Ryan Seacrest's radio show yesterday and she basically screamed "UNCLE!"
Eh. I'm glad she didn't try to remind us that she's a successful "writer" and "producer". Is it wrong that I don't completely hate what she said? Yes, I'm firmly ensconced on Team Hamm (forever and always), and I love that The Hamm isn't afraid to engage in a real conversation about mind-numbing trash television and what it says about our (dumb) culture. While I think Kim's "give everybody a gold star because we're all part of the same celebrity ecosystem" argument is much too simplistic, I give her some credit for her Zen-like approach here. She's basically saying "Live and let live, bitches." Oh, and Ryan asked Kim is she's dating Kanye West. She said, "I think I'm still married…I'm really not dating right now at all: I'm really just focusing on work. I know I always say this, but I'm trying to just get through my situation and just have fun." Sigh… she really is that vapid. Oh, and I have no idea why these jeans exist. I think I had a pair of these when I was 7 years old. They were a bad idea then, and they're a bad idea now. Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.      |
| Michael Lohan threatens bodily harm to porn star who claims Lindsay paid for sex Posted: 21 Mar 2012 09:02 AM PDT
[From Radar] This is a guy who secretly taped his daughter’s (and everyone else’s) phone calls and sold tapes to the press of Lindsay crying and begging for help during what she assumed was a private phone call with her family. This is also the guy who photographed at least two of his ex girlfriends nude and then sold the photos to the press after they inevitably received his fists full of anger (and some kicks to the crotch for good measure). But he would “protect” his daughter by beating up a guy she was having consensual sex with, that she probably paid dearly for. What a great dad. Here’s Michael and a woman described as “his new girlfriend” on 2-12-12. There are a lot of women with low self esteem in this world. Credit: WENN.com. He’s also shown on 3-16-12. Credit: FameFlynet          |
| Star: Jennifer Lopez’s “gut” is telling her to marry Casper Smart in Mexico Posted: 21 Mar 2012 08:47 AM PDT I know. The tabloids are always full of speculation about Jennifer Lopez and her facially-challenged boy-toy Casper Smart. Some say that Jennifer thinks Casper is "the one" and that her kids already call him "Papi". Some say that Jennifer is self-aware enough to NOT marry this one. But after Jennifer gushed about Casper in her Vogue Mag interview… I'm more inclined to think she might end up married to this one. It was looking iffy there for a moment, especially since Casper didn't get to be J.Lo's plus-one at the Oscars. But I think Star Magazine is on to something:
[From Hollywood Life] Can we talk about how funny this line is – "Jennifer's gut is telling her that Casper is marriage material"? Like, Jennifer is known for having a really "gut"-detector or something. Like she hasn't already been through three marriages and she's the wisest woman ever, and we should all respect her infatuation with a 24-year-old backup dancer. But yes… that Cavalli tweet really was sketchy, and God knows, Casper doesn't seem eager to move on. They'll totally get married. Photos courtesy of Fame, WENN, Star cover courtesy of Celebrity Dirty Laundry.    |
| Katie Holmes takes pajama-clad Suri out to dinner in New York Posted: 21 Mar 2012 08:19 AM PDT We haven't had new photos of Katie Holmes since the Oscars. She didn't get to go to the Oscars, but Tom Cruise let her come to the post-Oscars parties, where I'm sure she had to watch him do his victory rounds. Before the Oscars, Katie had gone dark for a while too – and I haven't seen Suri in months! I always wonder what Katie and Suri are up to when we don't have photos of them for extended periods of time. What are they up to? Are they being audited? Reprogrammed? Or are they just on vacation? And then I wonder why – when they do come around – it seems like we get multiple sightings of them every day. Maybe it's just that they're in New York right now. They always get pap'd a lot in NYC. So these are photos of Katie, Suri and Katie's mom at various points yesterday. Suri looks taller! I really like Suri's little pink dress too – it's super-cute. I hope her mom didn't design it. But Suri didn't get to wear her pretty pink dress to dinner last night – Katie brought Suri to the ABC Kitchen with Suri only in her jammies and a coat. Suri even carried a little lunchbox – The Mail assumes that Suri was actually carrying food in there, but I think it's possible Suri was using a lunchbox as a purse. You can see more photos of the outings here. This buffet of photo-ops made me wonder if Katie is about to begin promotion of some project… but she's not. She hasn't filmed a movie since Jack and Jill (that Adam Sandler catastrophe). She doesn't have anything pending on her IMDB page either. Hm. Last thing: I really want Katie's fuzzy white sweater. I used to have a similar black sweater, but the shedding got on my nerves, and I gave it away. BIGGEST REGRET EVER. Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.    |
| Ray J has ‘a ton of sexually explicit photos and videos’ of Whitney Houston, ruh oh Posted: 21 Mar 2012 07:44 AM PDT
[From Radar] Both participants in a sex tape have to sign off on its release, so you can be sure that everything that Vivid puts out especially (as they’re one of the most legit adult film companies) has the blessing of both of the stars, who are getting paid very well for it. There are some cases where celebrity sex tapes have been released without their permission (Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee, for instance, and questionably Paris Hilton, although rumor has it she made a mint) but you can be sure that all the recent ones have their blessing. That’s preface to the fact that the estate for Whitney Houston has to approve this, and you know they’re not going to. There are still tens of millions to be made off her incredible music catalog, and as this article states they’re not going to mess with her image. Ray-J should just hook up with another starlet and get her to make a sex tape with him. I hear Lindsay Lohan is single, and she’ll do it for a bottle of Smirnoff and a pack of smokes. These photos are from 2008. Credit: FameFlynet    |
| Robert DeNiro’s “joke” at Michelle Obama’s fundraiser causes controversy Posted: 21 Mar 2012 07:37 AM PDT First Lady Michelle Obama was in New York City a few days ago. She did a few events around town, like making an appearance on The Late Show with David Letterman, and she also hosted a fundraiser that brought out some big New Yorkers like Beyonce and Harvey Weinstein. Robert DeNiro also came out for the fundraiser – I always forget that he's an Obama supporter. I think he used to be a Republican…? Maybe. But he supported Obama in the 2008 election, and it looks like DeNiro is sticking with the choice for this election cycle. So when Bob DeNiro comes to your fundraiser, you let him speak, right? Right. So DeNiro spoke, and he even had a little "joke" about potential GOP first ladies:
My first reaction was to laugh, just because I think it simply works as a joke. Then I started thinking – how would I feel if some Republican had asked, in jest, "Is the country ready for a black first lady?" I would feel… pissed off. Except THAT is exactly what happened in 2008 when the GOP pursued a campaign of "Michelle Obama is an ANGRY black woman, she hates America (because she’s black), she can't be First Lady of the United States." Which is why DeNiro's joke works as a parody of the old GOP talking points. It's sad that FLOTUS had to say it was "inappropriate." But it's also not comparable to Rush Limbaugh calling a young woman a "slut" and a "prostitute" either. Sigh… election year. Photos courtesy of WENN.    |
| Madonna’s new music video for “Girl Gone Wild”: tragic, interesting or just boring? Posted: 21 Mar 2012 07:11 AM PDT Last month, I covered Madonna's first music video from her new album MDNA. The single was "Give Me All Your Luv" and the video was absolutely AWFUL. It was epic in its sketchiness. So now Madge has a new music video for her next single, "Girl Gone Wild". Yes, Joe Francis already threatened to sue her for the "Girls Gone Wild" reference. I don't even know what to say about that. Sigh… here's the video, and I'll add my thoughts afterwards: Black and white. Plastic face. Cigarettes. Pills. Apple. Crotch-grabbing. Chains. Dudes in pantyhose. Chicken cutlet cheeks. Wall climbing (except not really). Gay dudes nuzzling each other. Sculpted eyebrows. Dudes in high heels. Basically… this is a sad mess. As Michael K said, it's like Madonna is referencing Lady Gaga's Madonna referencing. Madge is trying to do some old-school "Vogue" stuff, but it's just… sad. I have to give Madge credit for two things, though. One, her body is looking much better these days. I'm not being facetious either. I remember how gristly and hard an 'roidy she looked when she was training incessantly with Tracy Anderson. I don't know who is training her these days (I doubt it's still Tracy), but they're doing a much better job. Madge's body looks long and toned and graceful. The second thing I have to applaud her for: the weak vocals in this song. She's not a strong singer, and these vocals seem very, very soft. You can barely hear what she's saying. Cover art from MDNA.    |
| Jennifer Lawrence shows off her assets in Calvin Klein: beautiful or tacky? Posted: 21 Mar 2012 06:59 AM PDT Everyone who has seen X-Men: First Class knows that Jennifer Lawrence has a bangin' body. She played the young Mystique, complete with the extensive body-paint/makeup and nudity that the part required. So, I already knew that the girl has a lovely, healthy-looking figure with, frankly, awesome boobs. Unfortunately for all of us who love to see a healthy young woman embrace her figure, Jennifer Lawrence's style during The Hunger Games promotion has been a series of unflattering gowns and uncomfortable-looking cocktail dresses. Mostly "miss". It's like her stylist doesn't know Jennifer's strengths. Yesterday, Jennifer was promoting THG in New York, where she made an appearance on The Late Show with David Letterman, AND did the NYC premiere, AND a book signing. She showed off three different looks, with varying degrees of success. This green Calvin Klein was… not my favorite, but not my least favorite either. The best thing I can say about it is that at least J-Law's assets are finally being shown off. The worst thing I can say about it is that when she sitting down, it definitely seems like her girls need a tad more support. Oh, and I do love Jennifer in this color. She looks beautiful in green. This was my least favorite dress, which J-Law wore going into the Ed Sullivan theater. It's by Raoul. It doesn't suit her body type. My favorite was this Prabal Gurung dress that Jennifer wore coming out of the Ed Sullivan theater. It's interesting, the cut is nice, and it makes her look like a young adult (as opposed to an awkward teen). Photos courtesy of WENN.    |
| Us Weekly: Reese Witherspoon is 12-weeks pregnant with her third child Posted: 21 Mar 2012 05:03 AM PDT Not to be rude, but we always have photos of Reese Witherspoon looking "baby bumpy". I think she gains weight in her stomach, and whenever we declare that we see a "baby bump," we're wrong. As is everyone else who calls it, of course. So I'm including photos of Reese from March 4th and the 16th, just to show you that she does have a noticeable baby bump, but we had a good reason for not calling it. Us Weekly must have gotten the wink and the nod from Reese's people though, because they're putting Reese and her womb on this week's cover. There's no confirmation from Reese or her rep, though. Interesting…
[From Us Weekly] I think it's probably on. Us Weekly would have run with this cover unless they got a confirmation from someone very close to Reese. I mean… yeah, Us Weekly isn't People Magazine, but they're also not OK! Mag. I believe Reese is knocked up this time. She and Jim Toth have been married a year, and I think the time is right for her. She's also talked about having another baby with Jim, and how good he is to her, so… I don't know. It makes sense to me. I think Jim is a keeper, and he’s a good step-dad to her kids with Ryan. I think Reese and Jim are going to be together for a long, long time. Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and WENN.    |
| Emma Watson left university again, this time to work with Sofia Coppola Posted: 21 Mar 2012 04:15 AM PDT Last year, I was increasingly disturbed by Emma Watson's ever-changing story about her university studies. I was yelled at, often and vigorously, but I still think my point stands: Emma took time off from Brown University because she wanted to work, model and party. It's not against the law – it's her choice. But don't ask me to buy an image of Emma as some Natalie Portman-type who is studious and intellectually industrious. I had to eat some of my criticisms of Emma when she did end up "transferring" from Brown to Oxford last fall. I had hoped that this would be the end of the whole "Is she a young woman who prioritizes her education, or is she just interested in working?" debate. Except the transfer didn't last long – these are photos of Emma arriving in LA a few days ago, where she has just started work on Sofia Coppola's The Bling Ring:
[From The Press Association] The opportunity for a young actress to work with Sofia Coppola… well, I understand Emma's choice. Totally. When that call comes in, you take it. But I fear we'll be seeing another round of interviews from Emma about how she's just too much of a perfectionist to go to school AND work. Maybe Emma will go back to school after this. Or maybe she'll just stop trying to make everything work perfectly. You can see some photos of Emma in character in Calabasas here. Sofia gave Emma long extensions. Is Emma playing the main girl in The Bling Ring, the ringleader? Because from what I remember of that girl, she looked really, really trashy and very "LA". Emma needs a fake-tan, more makeup and some glitter or something. UPDATE: Thanks to the people pointing out that Oxford has a different semester-schedule than American universities. Maybe Emma is on a break right now, and I believe that she’s “deferring” her next semester too. But that’s what she said about Brown University too, and that ended up being months until she finally transferred to Oxford. Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.    |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
