Cele|bitchy |
- Angelina Jolie is reportedly “angry” with Jane Pitt over Jane’s anti-gay letter
- Rihanna tweets booze photo after her grandma’s death: cut her a break?
- Did Nicole Kidman “offer support and help” to Katie Holmes under the radar?
- Duchess Kate allegedly stopped having sex with William months ago
- Katie Holmes used burner phones to throw Tom Cruise off the divorce trail
- Tom Cruise’s ex auditor: Scientology head Miscavige “obsessed” with Cruise
- Katie Holmes: “If something’s not okay, then I make it known, I will deal with things”
- PETA slams model Alessandra Ambrosio for dyeing her puppy
- Jane Fonda: “At 74, I have never had such a fulfilling sex life”
- Cumberbatch on his Cumberbitches: ‘I worry about what it says for feminism’
Angelina Jolie is reportedly “angry” with Jane Pitt over Jane’s anti-gay letter Posted: 11 Jul 2012 08:49 AM PDT Last week, everybody went a little bit crazy over Brad Pitt's mom Jane. Jane Pitt had written a letter to the editor (for a Missouri newspaper) in which she extolled the virtues of Mitt Romney and bashed "Barack Hussein Obama — a man who sat in Jeremiah Wright's church for years, did not hold a public ceremony to mark the National Day of Prayer, and is a liberal who supports the killing of unborn babies and same-sex marriage." Considering Brad is a well-known and vocal liberal Democrat, some of us were surprised that his mom was SO conservative, even using the "dog-whistle" wording that many die-hard Republican operatives use. Brad did not issue any kind of statement about his mom's letter, and Brad's brother Doug was on the Today show this week, and Doug basically said, "Eh, families can disagree about politics without it being a thing, you know?" So, obviously, Angelina Jolie is the devil. I mean, that's where this whole story is going! It was always going to end up there – no matter who does what or who says whatever, it's always going to end up with "… and Angelina is the devil." Star Magazine claims that Angelina is going to "confront" Jane about her political views, because, obviously.
I really don't get it. Angelina rarely discusses her personal politics (I really think she's a neo-con), so why is everyone behaving like she's some strident, in-your-face liberal? As for the whole idea that Brad's mom should STFU because her son is a celebrity and a Democrat? That's just dumb. This was never about "Jane Pitt is not entitled to her political opinions and she shouldn't speak." She can hold whatever arch-conservative opinion she wants, and she can shout them from whatever rooftop she wants. Everyone else has a right to react to her opinions, though, which is something to keep in mind in these discussions. Freedom of speech works both ways – Jane Pitt thinks President Obama is an anti-prayer, "baby-killing" lover of all things homosexual. I think Jane Pitt is an ignorant wingnut. See? Freedom of speech. I'm sure Brad doesn't have the same opinions, and Angelina probably doesn't either, and maybe they'll say something, maybe they won't. My guess is that none of Jane's political thoughts came as any kind of SHOCK to their systems. Jane and Angelina seem genuinely close – and my guess is that when Angelina is with the Pitt family, they're just talking about babies and grandchildren and work, not politics. |
Rihanna tweets booze photo after her grandma’s death: cut her a break? Posted: 11 Jul 2012 08:45 AM PDT Here are some photos of Rihanna and her grandmother’s funeral in Barbados. I know that, on most days, we speak of Rihanna in terms of her trashy behavior and very questionable attire. She also tends to talk a lot of smack on her Twitter page, but Rihanna often posts photos of her family (with whom she is very close) as well. So now those worlds are colliding after Rihanna’s beloved “GranGranDolly,” Clara Braithwaite, passed away. We’ve posted some photos of Rihanna with her Granny before, and it’s clear that the two had a special relationship. Now Rihanna is publicly mourning on Twitter as well:
[From Daily Mail] At first, it seems so skeevy that the paps have attended the funeral of a pop star’s grandmother with intent to capitalize therein. However, it can also be argued that Rihanna invites such scrutiny when she posts photos of her holding a beer bottle while referencing her Granny. Obviously, Rihanna lives her life in a very public way — I just hope this tragic event doesn’t push her further down the spiral. After the funeral, RiRi traded in her heels for some Chucks. I kind of love the look. Photos courtesy of WENN |
Did Nicole Kidman “offer support and help” to Katie Holmes under the radar? Posted: 11 Jul 2012 08:03 AM PDT Many of us have been wondering about Nicole Kidman along-side our interest and coverage of all things Tom Cruise-Katie Holmes. Allegedly, Nicole has been in hiding since Katie filed for divorce, and Nicole has issued no public statements. Nicole might even be avoiding her friends because she doesn't want to discuss anything. I theorized last week that Nicole – who made her own particular deal with Xenu, Tom and the CoS – would have to make a pro-Tom statement at some point if she was backed into a corner. Nic’s people have already had to come out and deny a story about Nicole allegedly telling Katie to “stay strong”! But the speedy divorce settlement between Tom and Katie has made that issue kind of a non-starter, so Nicole got to stay quiet. That doesn't mean that Nicole's PR people (doesn't she share a publicist with Jennifer Aniston?) aren't pushing a sympathetic version of Nicole to Us Weekly. That's how I'm reading Us Weekly's cover story this week – Team Kidman attaching itself to Katie Holmes's spectacular legal and PR moves. But is it true?
Seriously, do you see any of this happening? I'm not so sure. It's possible that Katie reached out to Nicole at some point this year to get Nicole's advice on how to bolt – but really, what did Nicole know about bolting? Tom dumped Nicole – not the other way around. And it really feels like Katie was trying to detach herself from everyone in Tom's orbit, and she wouldn't try to strike up a confidence with Nicole, a woman who might sell Katie out to Xenu. Basically, I think this whole think is Nicole trying to ride on Katie's coattails and Team Kidman trying to save face – because Nicole didn't fight Tom like Katie did. It will be interesting to see what the Murdoch press outlets have to say about all of this too. |
Duchess Kate allegedly stopped having sex with William months ago Posted: 11 Jul 2012 07:29 AM PDT Way back, more than a year and a half ago, the tabloids were attempting to introduce Kate Middleton (then Prince William's fiancée) to the world. Those of us who were paying attention knew Kate, we knew how many times William had dumped her or screwed around on her, and we knew that she always took him back, no questions asked. But The Enquirer tried to convince us that Kate was playing an old game on William once she had gotten the ring – sources claimed that Kate stopped putting out, allegedly to make their wedding night special, but really because Kate didn't feel like exerting herself once she had gotten the ring. I referred to it as "closing down her biscuit factory" which, hilariously, some people thought "Oh, I didn't know Kate owned a literal biscuit factory." Anyway, there's a new report suggesting that Kate has shut down her biscuit factory once again – allegedly, she hasn't put out in FOUR MONTHS. Which might go a long way in explaining A) why William seems to have less patience for his wife these days and B) why Kate has been flirting up a storm with Prince Harry.
[From Star Magazine via Hollywood Life] I got the "four months" figure from HL's headline, by the way. I'm surprised that it's not mentioned in the story. Now, has Kate really cut William off? Is it all about his "work schedule" (even though he's done more partying and public events in the past two months than work)? Or does Kate not want to ruin her figure? Eh. I would bet that Kate is on The Pill or something, so it's not like she has to "cut him off" to ensure that she won't get pregnant. While I have my doubts about the accuracy of this story, I do wonder if Will and Kate's sex life is exciting or passionate or anything beyond rote at this point. |
Katie Holmes used burner phones to throw Tom Cruise off the divorce trail Posted: 11 Jul 2012 05:55 AM PDT Of course, there are a million new Katie Holmes stories. It's Wednesday, the day the tabloids come out, so there's going to be a lot of Monday-morning-quarterbacking and post-settlement cleanup on Katie and Tom Cruise's divorce. Where should we start? Well, Katie got the cover of People Magazine again this week. I haven't seen all of the other tabloid covers, but I'm going to assume that she scored the cover of several (if not all) of the tabloids this week. Here's an excerpt from People Mag's "How Katie Took Control" cover story:
I really thought that the "switched out her phones" rumor had been discussed and confirmed last week, but several outlets are running with the story like it's completely new. The LA Times also has a "behind the scenes of Katie's escape" story, which you can read here. The LAT says Katie was using burner phones for all of her dealings over the past month, and she had secretly hired three law firms in three states to prepare for her legal fight – all without Tom knowing. The LAT also says that in the divorce/custody settlement, Katie is going to determine how Suri is educated, and Katie got guarantees that Tom and Xenu won't ever try to "alienate" Suri from her. Let's see, what other news is there? Radar and The Enquirer say that the last time Tom and Katie were together – in Iceland several weeks ago – they probably weren't even staying in the same hotel suite. Apparently, Tom's bodyguards put tape on all of the hotel security cameras and no one has any idea if Katie and Tom stayed in the same luxe suite. Which… is that news? One of my favorite stories this morning is from Page Six – I've been hearing stuff about Tom having "chemistry" with Olga Kurylenko for a few weeks, but I thought it was all just some counter-PR from Team Cruise, trying to make Tom look like a big, beefy heterosexual dude who might have a wandering eye and OF COURSE that's why Katie left Tom. Well, Page Six got a tip from Team Cruise that Tom and Olga have "a great deal of chemistry" as they work together on Oblivion, meaning Tommy was like, “Hey, baby, would you like to touch my e-meter?” They were photographed holding hands and looking smiley – while filming a scene. BUT! Team Olga pushed back against the rumors, letting it be known that Olga is definitely dating Danny Huston, and Danny Huston has been her boyfriend for a year or so and of course Olga would not be interested in Tom. Olga's rep even went on the record with Page Six: "Completely not true. She is dating Danny Huston. You are so going down the wrong path." No one wants a piece of Tommy. Poor Tommy. |
Tom Cruise’s ex auditor: Scientology head Miscavige “obsessed” with Cruise Posted: 11 Jul 2012 05:25 AM PDT
Rathbun even predicted that Scientology would then play the victim and “make the media and their sources wrong for having allegedly jumped the gun to insinuate Scientology into the matter.” Lo and behold, Tom Cruise’s lawyer just issued a statement this morning that. “The Church of Scientology played absolutely NO ROLE in the divorce settlement talks at all. Period. The mere suggestion that the Church was involved in any element of the talks and ultimate settlement is categorically false. Anyone suggesting otherwise is just wrong.” This means that Rathbun called Tom Cruise’s divorce playbook ahead of time, down to each point. (You can read more on the Village Voice’s blog.) Kudos to him, really. It just goes to show how deep Cruise is involved with this cult and how he follows their guidance in all matters. Rathbun just did a radio interview for political talk show host Michael Smerconish. He explained how the cult operates under David Miscavige, about Cruise’s position in Scientology, and about how Miscavige brought Cruise back into the fold after he was “out” of the cult during his marriage to Nicole Kidman. Rathbun also discussed the way that Scientologists harassed and stalked him daily for about a year after he left. I was so impressed with how calm and well spoken he was. You can listen to the interview here and I’ve transcribed some of it below. This guy sounded very intelligent and his story was fascinating.
The violence and psychological abuse that Rathbun talks about were covered in a series of articles in the Tampa Bay Tribune which ran in 2009, we covered it at the time and you can read it here. At that time, Rathbun also claimed that Scientology coordinated Tom’s divorce from Nicole Kidman, declaring her an impediment to his commitment to Cos and encouraging Tom and Nicole’s split. Rathbun’s version of this story is consistent with at least two other ex-Scientologists who have spoken to the press, actor Jason Beghe and now ex Scientologist Nancy Many, who recently spoke to Radar Online. Nancy told Radar that “They had this wonderful anniversary then as far as I am concerned, he gets work done one on one and is told 'You've got to get back into the fold, Nicole is stopping you,' all this was manipulation.” So according to at least three known Scientologists who have spoken on the record, Cruise was told to dump Nicole Kidman because Miscavige wanted him as his boy and Kidman wasn’t committed to the cult. I love that Katie was able to blindside him and get out on her own. You can purchase Rathbun’s book, What is Wrong With Scientology, on Amazon.com. The image on the cover is of Scientologists coming over to Marty’s house to “bust” him, they call themselves “squirrel busters,” for practicing their religion outside of the cult. You can watch a video of that below. Marty loses his cool and takes their camera, but can you blame him? The “Squirrel Busters,” aka Scientologists, visit Marty’s house to harass him. Here’s Tom Cruise accepting the “Freedom Medal of Valor” Award in 2004, along with some segments of his Scientology promotional video: Here are some new photos of Cruise on the set of Oblivion in June Lake, California yesterday. Got to keep up that action hero image. The Sun notes that he’s not wearing his wedding ring, but he’s on set it’s hard to tell if he’s taken it off for good. He is divorced now though. Photo credit: L Prima/FAMEFLYNET |
Katie Holmes: “If something’s not okay, then I make it known, I will deal with things” Posted: 11 Jul 2012 05:00 AM PDT As we previewed last week, Elle Magazine hit the jackpot by giving Katie Holmes their August cover, and doing an interview just about six weeks before she filed for divorce. We had some of the early interview excerpts last week, and now Elle has released an additional image from their cover shoot, plus even more quotes. Here's some additional coverage:
The way she talks about her sexuality… it's making me wonder. Could it be… no. NO, of course not. Of course Katie Holmes didn't quietly set up some jumpoff on the sidelines. Of course she wasn't screwing around. Because if she was, wouldn't we have heard about it? Unless the dirt she had on Tom Cruise was just that damaging – so damaging that Team Cruise couldn't even fight back. Plus, what if Katie had fooled around on Tom? Wouldn't most of us give her an "Atta girl"? True, cheating is wrong. But isn't there a "Xenu Exception" in the cheating rules? Anyway, Bedhead went through some of the rumored details of Tom and Katie's divorce settlement yesterday. By most accounts, Katie got primary custody of Suri and Tom is allowed visitation, although there are many rumors about "limitations" being put on Cruise's access to Suri. Something about no Xenu, no Xenu-tastic handlers, etc. Us Weekly had an exclusive yesterday with a "source close to Holmes" who said, "She won and is happy. Very happy. She can move on and finally live her life. [She] did this only for her daughter. That was all she cared about. [She] pulled it off brilliantly. She has her career back and her daughter. She will be a huge star now. . . This was all played so well. Katie is very happy with how it all came out.” Haha. Brag much? But seriously, Katie should be proud of herself. She pulled off a ballsy coup de grâce on her marriage and she came out of it A) With everything she wanted and B) With her public image better than before. Meanwhile, people are starting to wonder/worry about Tom Cruise. What's next for him? Jennifer Love Hewitt? Probably not. LaineyGossip alluded to some intense auditing, which will probably involve David Miscavige in leather chaps with an e-meter clenched between his cheeks (don't you love that image?). But don't worry about Tom too much – as Rolling Stone hilariously/eerily points out, within the Church of Scientology, Tom Cruise is a God. Or a demi-god. Okay, he has GOD-like powers. You should just read this story – Tommy is an Operating Thetan who has traveled the Bridge to Total Freedom and has achieved a "rarefied sense of enlightenment." Scientologists believe Tom can move sh-t with his mind and telepathically communicate with humans and animals. FOR REAL. |
PETA slams model Alessandra Ambrosio for dyeing her puppy Posted: 11 Jul 2012 04:43 AM PDT These photos are notable for two reasons. One, Alessandra Ambrosio just gave birth on May 7th, only two months ago. And her body has already bounced back to "bangin'". The second reason why these photos are notable: Alessandra has a tiny little dog, who you can see in these photos. Her puppy is dyed purple and pink. As you can imagine, PETA had a sh-t fit.
PETA also had a fit when Emma Watson was seen out with what turned out to be a friend's pink-dyed puppy. Basically, PETA's latest mission in life is yelling about people dyeing their dogs. I don't really have a strong opinion either way – I think dyeing a dog is dumb, for sure, but I'll buy that it's not harmful to the dog if the owner makes sure that the dye is organic. I have to admit, though – Alessandra's puppy is EXTREMELY cute. I'm not even a small-dog person and I want to cuddle this puppy. Is it because the puppy is pink and purple? Not really. This puppy just has a really sweet face. |
Jane Fonda: “At 74, I have never had such a fulfilling sex life” Posted: 11 Jul 2012 04:40 AM PDT I go back and forth on Jane Fonda. On one side, I want to applaud her for discussing an issue that most older ladies won't discuss publicly: sex after a certain age. On the other side, Jane Fonda exhausts me and I wonder who she really IS if she's not extolling her own sexuality and her body. Anyway, Jane is 74 years old and she's got an active sex life. Her boyfriend, Richard Perry, is 70. And once Jane got her knee replaced, her life got really awesome. That's the phrasing she uses too – like having two good knees was her prerequisite for awesome sex. Ew. I just got the image. Ugh. I mean, go Jane…?
If true, more power to her. I was trying to think of some older dudes I wouldn't mind going to bed with… let's see. Pres. Bill Clinton, age 65. Jack Nicholson, age 75. Robert DeNiro, age 68. There are totally more, and go ahead and judge me. I wouldn't have any problems going to bed with a man forty years older than me (providing he was Jack Nicholson). So why is there this stigma with older ladies and sex? We shouldn't judge. I shouldn't judge. I will judge Jane's lover, though. He looks like the love child of Robert Goulet and John Waters. |
Cumberbatch on his Cumberbitches: ‘I worry about what it says for feminism’ Posted: 11 Jul 2012 04:28 AM PDT I never really paid much attention to what "female fans of Benedict Cumberbatch" called themselves/ourselves. I thought "Cumberbitch" was a default name for us, used along-side monikers like "Cumbersluts" and "Cumbergirls" and "The 'Batched." But it seems that "Cumberbitches" is a real thing, and they even have a Twitter for all things Cumber-obsessed. Benedict Cumberbatch's female fanbase of enthralled Cumberbitches has gotten so big that Benedict even gets asked about in interviews now. AND HE ANSWERS. Not only does he talk about The Cumberbitches, but he wonders aloud if one can be a self-proclaimed "Cumberbitch" and a "feminist". Oh, Cumby. I love you. Some highlights from Cumby's interview with the August issue of InStyle UK:
[From InStyle UK via Digital Spy & ONTD] Sigh… even though I don't think it's anti-feminist (or full-blown misogynistic) for women to refer to themselves as "bitches" or "Cumberbitches" (or "Fassbitches" or "Gandybitches" etc), I do love it when a man talks about feminism. I always loved Jon Hamm because, you know, The Hamm Dong and all of that. But when Hamm started talking about the sisterhood and "sisters doing it for themselves" and really coming out as a strident feminist, my love knew no bounds. I'm starting to feel the same pangs for Cumby. Oh, and here's a Cumby interview from a few months ago where Cumby talked about The Cumberbitches: |
You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |