Cele|bitchy

Cele|bitchy


Kris Humphries wants a separation and annulment, and he might be gay too

Posted: 30 Nov 2011 08:51 AM PST

Do you think Kris Humphries is gay? I don't. I might buy "bi-curious" but not flat-out gay. But that's Star Mag's claim this week. So, at this point, the Kardashians are just throwing whatever they can at Kris. He's verbally abusive! He's lazy! He hates fatties! HE'S TOTES GAY.

Anyway, the big Kris Humphries news today is that Kris might be counter-filing some legal documents in response to Kim's divorce filing. According to People Magazine, Kris will be filing paperwork to seek a legal separation from Kim "within days." People's sources say that Kris's "ultimate intent" is to annul the 72-day marriage. Us Weekly actually managed to confirm this with Kris's rep:

What’s better than a divorce? An annulment.

Kris Humphries plans to respond to Kim Kardashian’s Oct. 31 divorce filing with a counterstrike of his own. A rep for the NBA star, 26, confirms to Us Weekly that Humphries will seek a legal separation from Kardashian, 31 — ultimately leading, he hopes, to an annulment of their 72-day union.

If Humphries gets his way, the couple will avoid divorce proceedings altogether.
Kardashian and Humphries tied the knot Aug. 20 in Montecito, Calif.; an ironclad prenuptial agreement guarantees that the reality starlet will hold onto all moneys earned during their marriage.

Humphries, whose prospects have opened once again now that the NBA lockout has ended, recently signed an endorsement deal with Sector watches worth $150,000.

Pals told Us that Humphries freeloaded off of his wife and could be downright cruel during their short-lived union.”He belittled her in front of people,” one insider said. “He’d call her stupid. It was truly sickening.”

“He tried to control Kim by bringing her down…He would say truly terrible things. One time, he said she had no talent and her fame wouldn’t last.”

Worst of all? Humphries even called the star “fat ass.”

[From Us Weekly]

I don't really understand the legal and financial implications of an annulment-versus-divorce in this case. Would Kris be able to get more money out of the Kardashians with an annulment, because the prenup isn't an issue anymore? Or is the annulment just an intellectual "clean slate" so Kris doesn't have to refer to Kim as his "ex-wife" forever? I don't get it. I also don’t think an annulment can happen given that they “consummated” the marriage, correct? Or is that where the whole “HE’S TOTES GAY” thing comes in?

Oh, and Radar has a really boring story about Kim's jealousy of Kris's relationship with his sister. A source told Radar, "Kris and Kaela have always been extremely close. They talk daily, exchange text messages, their parents are extremely proud that their children are so close. However, Kim was jealous of Kris’ relationship with Kaela. Kris holds his sister in very high regard, and takes her advice very seriously. Kim would often try and get Kris off the phone with Kaela by making suggestive comments, or telling him he needed to pick up after his dogs. Kim wanted the full attention on her at all times and saw Kris’ sister as competition. For his part, Kris thought his family were being treated like second class citizens and that was no more apparent than at the wedding.” And when Kim couldn't pull Kris's attention away, she would just beat him. You can read more about Kim's mistreatment of Kris's sister here.

Photos courtesy of Fame.
kris1 FP_8221568_Humphries_Kris_WIK_03_10 FP_8221572_Humphries_Kris_WIK_07_10

Gwyneth Paltrows deigns to discuss her own excellent racial sensitivity

Posted: 30 Nov 2011 08:10 AM PST

Gwyneth Paltrow can single-handedly heal America's racial divide! Not really, and I don't mean to make it sound like Gwyneth is claiming that either. Gwyneth appeared on the HuffPo Black Voices show The Tanning Effect to discuss race in America with host Steve Stoute, author of The Tanning of America, a book that explores how "hip-hop culture" changed the way Americans view race and the economy. So of course, he wanted to speak to Dame Gwyneth, who is America's Foremost Racial Expert. She's friends with Beyonce and Jay-Z, after all!



Long before captivating moviegoers across the globe with her award-winning acting skills, Gwyneth Paltrow was front and center of a pivotal cultural shift. While growing up in Santa Monica, California, her father, Bruce Paltrow, created and wrote for the late ’70s CBS drama “The White Shadow,” which examined racial stereotypes in America and exposed the actress to many seminal television “Tanning” moments. As she explains in HuffPost Black Voices latest episode of “The Tanning Effect,” Paltrow witnessed her father’s impact at the time on American society.

“I think the most ‘Tanning’ that I saw during that phase of my life was my dad, [who] created, wrote and directed a TV show called ‘The White Shadow,’ about a white basketball coach teaching basketball in an inner-city school,” she explained. “And that show that he did — I mean, obviously we were there a lot, but it was interesting to see that culturally start to permeate. And he did a lot of ‘firsts’ on that show. He had the first interracial kiss ever. It was a good show.”

“I learned a lot of it through the show, especially since they were using a lot of the stereotypes as a way to exploit them or expose them or to debunk them,” she continued. “And a lot of times obviously in a creative situation, those stereotypes are what causes tension and story lines and plots.”

Having an unbiased viewpoint on multicultural relationships is also a trait that the “Shakespeare in Love” star has shared with her two children. In fact, the 39-year-old admitted that the shift of beauty in America is “long overdue.”

“I don’t want to bemoan the fact that it should’ve happened 50 years ago, because it’s here now,” she added. “And it’s like the way I see it is that I have two little kids who are understanding the world in a time when Rihanna is on the cover of Vogue, and we have a black president. So their eyes are being as if they’re experiencing the world for the first time. All of this stuff is just root — it’s normal stuff for them. And that to me is what’s so incredible.”

“When my daughter understood what a president was, it was a black man. It’s not like me, where I grew up with all of these old white guys one after another … Their perspective on race and everything is completely open and completely different to how it was when I was a kid.”

[From Huffington Post]

I don't really have a problem with what Gwyneth is saying – she's just talking about her dad, who really was a ground-breaking television producer, and I don't have a problem with her comments about Obama and the shifting standards of beauty. She's right – it is important that all kids see that we have a black president, that African-American women are iconic, celebrated beauties, and that mommy's BFF is Beyonce.

Photos courtesy of WENN.
wenn3605962 wenn3623080 wenn3605977

OK! Mag: Jennifer Aniston wants to marry Justin Theroux on a Mexican beach

Posted: 30 Nov 2011 07:30 AM PST

Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux seemed to be loved up for the long haul. I've actually wondered recently if Justin is as "into" this Aniston-level celebrity extravaganza, or whether he'd rather be sitting in a dank bar, getting hammered with his hipster friends. Right now, though, and for the foreseeable future, Justin and Jennifer seem tight. Justin's partner of 14 years has been effectively jettisoned, and perhaps even paid off by Team Aniston. Justin's getting better paychecks, he made People Mag's Sexiest Man Alive list, and whatever whim he has, his rich sugar mama buys it for him. It works for them. So is it any surprise that a new round of "wedding" rumors has started up again?

Don't be surprised if Jennifer Aniston's a barefoot bride before the clock strikes 2012!

Jennifer Aniston has weathered more than her share of romantic disappointments after her devastating 2005 divorce from Brad Pitt — from Vince Vaughn to John Mayer to fleeting flings with Gerard Butler and Bradley Cooper. But friends of the actress agree that Justin Theroux is a keeper, the real deal.

As the pair settles into their new penthouse in NYC's Greenwich Village, you can tell by the gleam in Jen's eye, the uncharacteristic PDA and Justin's unfailing tenderness. And soon, according to sources, the couple will head south of the border to elope.

"Jen is talking about a beach wedding in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, at the end of December," a source close to the romantic-comedy queen confides to OK!. "It's definitely going to happen, and right now it's looking like sooner rather than later."

When Jen married Brad in 2000, the wedding was a $1 million beachside spectacular in Malibu, complete with 200 guests, a 40-piece gospel choir and a fireworks display. This time around she'll still have sea and sand — but it won't have the grand production values.

"Jen loves the idea of just taking off to Cabo and getting married in a sundress barefoot on the beach," the insider explains. "She wants it to be as spontaneous as possible, and she doesn't want it to be all fancy and complicated like her wedding to Brad. This wedding will not be for show. This is about two people who love each other making a commitment for life. They don't need all the bells and whistles."

Jen and Justin spent Thanksgiving in NYC, then headed to L.A. for a week, where Jen has business meetings. Then it's back to the Big Apple in early December.

"After that, they're heading to Europe for a romantic vacation," says the source. "Jen and Justin will be also promoting their film Wanderlust, but friends are guessing that may end up being their honeymoon."

[From OK! Magazine]

If it's true, I'm happy for her. I don't even think this is the product of the overactive imagination of Aniston's publicist – if this was an Aniston plant, I think she would have asked for the cover all to herself, instead of having to share it with Kourtney Kardashian, making it seem like Kourtney and Aniston ARE THE SAME. I think this is just the tabloids wanting their perpetual victim to get her "happy ending." I will say this too – out of all of the dudes that Aniston has dated after her divorce, I think Justin is the one most likely to get Aniston down the aisle again.

Also – Page Six had a blurb this morning which I do think is the product of Aniston's publicist:

Jennifer Aniston shared a romantic dinner with Justin Theroux on Monday in Hollywood. The pair, both casually dressed, looked cozy as they dined at the Sunset Tower Hotel's Tower Bar.

A witness in the restaurant said, "They sat in a corner table overlooking the city, deep in conversation and holding hands under the table. It was very sweet: They looked the image of happiness."

[From Page Six]

Yeah, we get it. Justin Theroux has a rainbow coming out of his ass now that he's dating Jennifer Aniston. She is the gift that keeps on giving!

Photos courtesy of Terry Richardson & cover courtesy of OK! Mag.
OKmag justjen1 justjen2

Daniel Craig covers GQ UK, says the Kardashians are “f–king idiots”

Posted: 30 Nov 2011 06:55 AM PST

Daniel Craig is a curmudgeon. I don't know if he's always been so surly, or if it happened to him over the past five-six years as his career exploded (when he became James Bond). I tend to think that pre-Bond, he had some surliness, but I remember seeing him in interviews pre-Bond, and he just seemed more… open. More easy-going. Not so f–king angry about everything. Nowadays, he seems to have a shorter fuse. Daniel Craig will verbally bitch-slap anyone and anything. His interviews are full of expletives, which I usually think is a sign of someone trying too hard, but with Daniel, it just makes me think that he likes to talk dirty, and I like that. Anyway, Daniel has a new cover interview with GQ UK, to promote The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo. Daniel verbally bitch-slaps the Kardashians, and really any celebrity who whores out their private life.

On famewhoring in general: "I think there’s a lot to be said for keeping your own counsel. It’s not about being afraid to be public with your emotions or about who you are and what you stand for. But if you sell it off it’s gone. You can’t buy it back – you can’t buy your privacy back. 'Ooh I want to be alone.' F–k you. We’ve been in your living room. We were at your birth. You filmed it for us and showed us the placenta and now you want some privacy?"

On the Kardashians specifically: "Look at the Kardashians, they’re worth millions. I don’t think they were that badly off to begin with but now look at them. You see that and you think ‘what, you mean all I have to do is behave like a f–king idiot on television and then you’ll pay me millions.' I’m not judging it – well, I am obviously."

Having a quiet wedding with Rachel Weisz: "We got away with it. We did it privately and I’ve got a lot of people to thank for that. But that was the point, we did it for private reasons. Because we didn’t want it f–ked up, because that would be sharing a secret. And the whole point is that it was a secret. A secret is a secret in my mind."

On his marriage and Rachel: "Look, I’m in love. I’m very happy. And that is as far as I’m prepared to go. Life is long, life goes wrong and I don’t want to say something now that might be thrown back later."

On his career: "I’m definitely not satisfied about my career. I don’t know how you can be, it’s the very nature of things. I’m always trying to figure it out, and I’m kind of unsatisfied constantly. I always want to get it right and I don’t know what the answer to it is. But I do know that it’s out there and I do know it’s worth looking for."

[From The Mail]

I don't feel like calling Daniel out on whatever minor hypocrisies, mostly because I don't really think he is a hypocrite. He's never really been a famewhore, and he's always played his personal life pretty close to the vest. I understand the distinction he's making between "famewhoring your private life" and simply being honest about who you're with. Daniel hasn't had any problems walking the red carpet with girlfriends in the past, and I don't think acknowledging his new wife or the fact that he's in love is "famewhoring." (Although I’m sure Dame Gwyneth would disagree.) Sigh… I wish Daniel was talking dirty to me right now. Rachel Weisz is such a lucky bitch.

PS… Did anyone else LOL at the delicious bitchiness of "I’m not judging it – well, I am obviously." Daniel is such a judgy bitch.

GQ UK photos courtesy of The Mail.
DC3 DC1 DC2

Kourtney Kardashian is pregnant with her second baby

Posted: 30 Nov 2011 06:03 AM PST


For those of you hoping that Kourtney Kardashian would eventually ditch the jerk she claims is her first baby’s daddy (although this guy is the more likely candidate), or for those of you rooting for the inevitable downfall of the Kardashians that is way too long im coming, this will not come as welcome news. Kourtney Kardashian is pregnant with her second baby, presumably by her live-in lover, Scott Disick. E! has this news, which will undoubtedly bolster the brand of a reality franchise which is currently the sh*tter despite high ratings. Kourtney’s eventual second baby will join his or her older (half) brother, Mason, who turns two in two weeks.

Kourtney Kardashian and Scott Disick are expecting their second child together.

In an exclusive statement to E! News, Kourtney says, “Scott and I are so excited to announce that we are expecting our second child and are thrilled to be expanding the love in our family.” Kourt first confirmed the happy news to Us Weekly.

And what perfect timing! The eldest Kardashian sister just started her web series, Kourtney’s Mommy Blog, on E! Online, where she dishes on what she’s learned raising Mason, shares her kid tips, parenting philosophy and A-list know-how, starting with fashion.

[From E! Online]

Kourtney has a new “Mommy vlog” on E! in which she shows off Mason’s closet and all his shoes. She says that she likes dressing him more than she likes dressing herself, and that it’s “all about layering” and “all about shoes” and accessories. The kid is two freaking years old. She also puts down how other mothers dress their kids. “I see so many little boys and their outfits are so cute and their moms put kind of dorky shoes on them and I think it’s all about the shoes.” My kid is very picky about his shoes and will try on ten pairs before he settles on one that is comfortable for him. He will then want to wear those shoes every day and won’t wear any other pair. It’s not a priority for me to make sure my child looks fashionable, he has to be comfortable first. He also prefers shoes that light up and have velcro, which Kourtney would surely consider “dorky.” Does she look at families without the means to buy their children over a dozen shoes they’ll quickly grow out of and think “it’s all about the shoes, that kid looks dorky?” This family is ridiculous. They’re wasting wealth on crap and will be struggling to hold on to the designer goods they hold dear once their fame fades. Also, look at Scott in those mismatched stripes. He would benefit from getting dressed by Kourtney too.

Anyway congratulations to Kourtney and Scott. I forsee another obscenely wasteful over-the-top wedding for this family.

Kourtney is shown out on 11/28 (dress) and 11/29 (t-shirt and sweats). Credit: WENN.com

Beyonce, by her own claims, is more than eight months pregnant right now?

Posted: 30 Nov 2011 06:00 AM PST

Here are some new photos of Beyonce and her bump in NYC yesterday. I don't even know. Do you really want me to start in on this? Because I will.

Recently, Beyonce released a short behind-the-scenes video of her video shoot for "Countdown" – the music video where she plagiarized a Belgian choreographer. In this video, Beyonce identifies the date as September 23rd, and she claims she's six months pregnant. UM, WTF?!?!?!?

That means she more than eight months pregnant right now. Is this how a eight-months pregnant lady looks? And that means she's due in the beginning of January? Which means…? Jesus, it's too early in the morning for Beyonce's never-ending bump conspiracies. Speaking of conspiracies, Bey also released an "alternate" version of the "Countdown" video, this time without the blatantly plagiarized choreography. This is how Bey rolls – don't acknowledge the plagiarism, just sweep it under the rug and act like it never happened:

And I'd just like to add more fodder that I haven't seen discussed thus far: in all of Beyonce's music videos from 4, Bey hasn't been "showing". Does this mean that she filmed all of her music videos over the summer? Or does it mean she just detached her pillowy bump so that she could dance awkwardly for strange men whilst fanning her vadge?

Photos courtesy of Pacific Coast News.
70207PCN_Beyonce03 70207PCN_Beyonce04

Ali Lohan on plastic surgery: “I’m 17, do you think my mom would sign off on that?”

Posted: 30 Nov 2011 05:59 AM PST

Several months ago, everyone really started worrying about 17-year-old Ali Lohan. There were photos of her in NYC where she looked… really jacked. Like she'd had lip injections and some surgical work on her face, plus she'd been starving herself and she looked really bony and emaciated. Many of us figured that it was likely Dina Lohan's doing, considering Ali is now old enough to be "pimped out" by her mom, and in Ali's case, that means being a "model". Ali had scored modeling representation (with a legit agency), and the agency and the Lohan family went out of their way to claim that Ali had not gotten any "work" done to her face. Personally, I thought Ali had gotten some lip injections (which weren't permanent), and she had gotten her breast implants taken out. Anyway, Ali is officially a "model" now – she scored her first magazine cover with Fault Mag, and now she's the cover girl for Page Six Magazine. Page Six had an early excerpt of Ali's interview:

Lindsay Lohan's little sister Aliana, at 17, is growing up fast. Tall and with sunken cheekbones, Aliana (she's ditched her childhood nickname Ali) has a contract with Next Model Management. Aliana appears on the cover of Page Six Magazine, inside the New York Post tomorrow.

Recently two different photos of her were juxtaposed, fueling online rumors of dramatic weight loss and even surgical procedures. Aliana, who explains her new look as a growth spurt, says, "I was cracking up. Because, like, when would I do that (surgery)? I'm 17 years old. That's not legal! I would need my mother's signature, and do you think my mom would sign off on that? No! Its not the right thing to do. . . . It's stupid. I don't listen to it. Its absolutely not true."

Aliana is keen to find her own way in the modelling world. Cindy Crawford is her role model, she says, "for having branded her name really well."

But despite seeking out her own path, Aliana is very close to her family. Of Lindsay she says, "You can't trust anyone so we talk to each other about everything. . . . I admire how strong she is."

Aliana insists she is the opposite of a wild child, she doesn't drink or smoke, and, "I just say no [to drugs]. I'm lucky enough that I had my sister to learn from…I've seen people do it to her and I've learned to be like, 'That's stupid, no'. That's why Lindsay and me are so close, because we're able to talk about those things together."

[From Page Six]

I'm reminded of that Plum Miami Magazine interview (the infamous one where Linnocent crack-screeched, "Move that cone, I'm Lindsay Lohan!") where the writer said that Ali was often the designated "adult" in Linnocent's nightly crack shenanigans. I actually believe that Ali is probably "the sober one" in her family – I believe that she's had to grow up really fast with her parents and her sister being the catastrophic messes that they are. As for the "legality" of Ali's plastic surgery – it's kind of sweet that she thinks we have a high opinion of Dina. We know Dina – we know Dina would sign anything to pimp out her kids.

Photos courtesy of Fame, Fault Mag.
ali1 FP_8026469_Lohan_lindsay_FP6_02_30 FP_8041300_LohanSisters_LiquorStore_EXCL_FP7_11_32 FP_8040268_LohanAli_Skinny_EXCL_FP6_01_05 FP_8041361_LohanSisters_LiquorStore_EXCL_FP7_32_32 FP_8041305_LohanSisters_LiquorStore_EXCL_FP7_16_32

Are the current crop of Victoria’s Secret models too thin compared to other years?

Posted: 30 Nov 2011 05:56 AM PST


E! is pointing out that the new crop of Victoria’s Secret models are rather tiny when compared to their predecessors from just a few years ago. While I don’t think that the new models are too thin in comparison to high fashion models, they’re skinnier overall than they used to be. I think they look like they’re healthy though and not emaciated. Still, it would be nice to see women that are more realistically fit instead of aspirationally thin for the most part. Victoria’s Secret is a brand to make everyday women look sexy, not a high fashion brand for the elite. Here’s what E! wrote about it:

Millions of fans (or those who merely enjoy seeing half-naked models in fancy undies) tuned in to watch the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show, but while you were drooling in front of your television sets, we had to wonder if some of those angels were drooling for a cheeseburger.
Seriously.

This isn’t exactly new news.

Back in April, Candice Swanepoel and her thin frame made headlines when we learned that her contract with the lingerie company was in jeopardy due to her dramatic weight loss (which she later commented on).

But watching the show, we can’t help but remember the days when models like Tyra Banks, Heidi Klum and Gisele Bündchen took over the catwalk with their curves. Don’t get us wrong, they still made us question our meal choices, but they were also voluptuous. And now, it seems like the wings on these newbies are literally going to whisk them away.

[From E! Online]

I don’t know. I mean Tyra and Heidi are somewhat more curvy than that current models, but Gisele was just as waif-like. I don’t see any curves on her. I looked up the 2006 and 2005 shows, and there were several other women that were maybe a smidgen larger than the current crop of models. They had hips but were still extremely fit. They really worked those outfits too. Here are a few I found. I’m not saying that it’s some big scandal or anything. They’re models, they’re always going to be skinny. I liked it a little better when they looked like they did in 2005. That’s something I can relate to a little more.

Look at Tyra Banks in 2005. I can’t stand her but she looks hot here:
Tyra Banks in 2005

Heidi Klum is super fit and tiny but she’s got some hips on her. Maybe those are just her bones, though. This is from 2008.
Heidi Klum 2008

Gisele in 2005. She’s about the same as the current models.
Gisele in 2005

Isabeli Fontana in 2005. Hot!
Isabeli Fontana in 2005

Selita EBanks, 2005
Selita EBanks in 2005

Fernada Tavares, 2005
Fernada Tavares in 2005

Caroline Trentini, 2005

Heather Marks, 2006

Marija Vujovic, 2005*

Alessandra Ambrosio in 2005

For comparison, here are some of the current models.

Alessandra Ambrosio, 2011

Miranda Kerr, 2011

Candice Swanepoel, 2011

Chanel Iman, 2011

Doutzen Kroes, 2011

Adriana Lima, 2011

I think this is Lindsay Ellingson, 2011

Caroline Winberg*, 2011

Maryna Linchuk*, 2011

wenn967382 wenn352334 wenn2175490 wenn353489 wenn353476 wenn353307 wenn353216 wenn353224 wenn353234 wenn353502 FP_8145741_VictoriasSecret_ FP_8145761_VictoriasSecret_ FP_8145768_VictoriasSecret_ FP_8145773_VictoriasSecret_ FP_8145772_VictoriasSecret_ FP_8145778_VictoriasSecret_ FP_8145780_VictoriasSecret_ FP_8145456_VictoriasSecret_ FP_8145781_VictoriasSecret_ FP_8145454_VictoriasSecret_

*Thanks to Mu for help with the model IDs! Photo credit: WENN and Fame

Jessica Simpson in red Donna Karan at a NYC event: lovely and glowing?

Posted: 30 Nov 2011 05:55 AM PST

Aw, these are cute photos. Jessica Simpson and her K-Fed, Eric Johnson, walked the nonexistent carpet last night for the Footwear News Achievement Awards at the Museum of Modern Art, an event which honors “top shoe designers, fashion brands, style stars, leading retailers, and industry icons.” Which includes Jessica, I'm assuming, because she designs a line of footwear which sells very well.

Anyway, Jessica wore this rather stunning red Donna Karan dress which… I LOVE. I love it on Jessica. I love the dress on its own too. I wonder if this was intended as a maternity dress or if Donna Karan refigured it for preggos. Honestly, I would love to own this dress, I like it so much. Farty looks really happy, doesn't she? She's "glowing" – although I'm sure Jessica would say that it's just farty sweat. I hope she is genuinely happy. I hope her K-Fed doesn't irritate her. I hope this is what they both want.

Oh, and thoughts about Jessica wearing heels while so, so preggo? She's said before that she'll probably give birth in Louboutins – her heel-wearing pregnancy is much more endearing than Beyonce's, isn't it?

Photos courtesy of Fame & WENN.
footwear_news_awards_04_wenn5761608 FP_8220090_Simpson_Jessica_2_AAR_11_18 FP_8220086_Simpson_Jessica_2_AAR_07_18 footwear_news_awards_17_wenn5761595 footwear_news_awards_09_wenn5761603 footwear_news_awards_19_wenn5761593

Kim Kardashian hit Kris Humphries on TV, Dr. Drew calls it domestic violence

Posted: 30 Nov 2011 05:54 AM PST

Dr. Drew is such a hack that he regularly armchair diagnoses celebrities with addictions and other problems based on interviews they’ve given. For instance he questioned Angelina Jolie’s charity work and wondered whether she was still on drugs after she admitted that she’d done heroin in her youth. He also called out Brad Pitt for admitting that he used to smoke pot, also in his past, and for moving his kids with Angie around while they’re working. (Kaiser did a recap of some of Dr. Drew’s nonsense here.) In this latest case, though, I’m rooting for Dr. Drew and I almost agree with him.

On the last episode of Kim & Kourtney go to New York so they can have a spin-off, Kim moves to punch Kris Humphries after the big oaf steps on her toe and breaks her pedicured nail. Kris of course quickly deflects Kim’s blow since he’s a giant basketball player. It looks like Kim was seriously going for him, and like she could have caused some damage if she landed that punch. Dr. Drew got all incensed about it and says it’s a clear incident of domestic violence and that domestic violence goes both ways, meaning women can commit it against men. He also said that stuff like this can escalate into a more dangerous, abusive situation. Go Dr. Drew?

Holy matrimony took an unholy turn back in October, when news broke that reality television star Kim Kardashian filed a disclaimer of interest — wait, no, I meant a petition for divorce from New Jersey Nets free agent forward Kris Humphries.

Their marriage lasted 72 days, just enough time to get footage for Kardashian’s new E! television series, Kourtney & Kim Take New York. The series debuted on Monday and featured startling footage of Kardashian winding up to punch Humphries for “accidentally breaking her toenail,” according to TheImproper.com.

Kardashian appears to be smiling while throwing the punch and Humphries doesn’t exactly cower in fear, but psychologist Dr. Drew Pinsky opined on CNN that the punch amounted to domestic violence.

“What you are seeing there is domestic violence,” Pinsky told viewers. “A lot of people watching this may not understand that and I get that. It looks playful. What's the big deal? It is a massive deal.”

Pinsky continued: “Kris and Kim, listen, they’re separating and that’s over with, this doesn’t need to be reported or anything. But anybody listening at home or viewing this has to understand the spectrum of domestic violence. And this is an incontrovertible piece of evidence of someone who is engaged in a domestic violence relationship.”

[From CBS Sports]

So for all the times that Kris calls Kim “fat” or acts like a dick or accidentally steps on her, Kim is behaving even worse by lashing out at him physically. Even if Kim’s punch was delivered with a smirk, it’s still domestic violence according to Dr. Drew. I don’t think she was joking, she looked serious about hitting him. It’s a hard call for me to make since I don’t like either one of them and don’t particularly give a sh*t, but young teens watch this show and they should know that’s not acceptable.

In other Dr. Drew news, it looks like he’s softening his stance against drugs. Or maybe he just bases it on whether he likes the celebrity or not. On the whole Miley Cyrus “I’m a stoner” Bob Marley birthday cake controversy, Dr. Drew said she’s not an addict. He told ExtraI don’t think it’s that big of a deal… Real marijuana addicts don’t quite talk like that. I don’t think we have somebody who has a drug problem on our hands.” Uh huh. When that Miley smoking “salvia” video came out in December of last year, Dr. Drew saidThis is a child who is in trouble and who is suffering and this is her way of trying to manage that. Get professional help.” I bet Miley or someone close to her reached out to him after that, so during her next crisis Drew would be on her side. It worked. Now the Kardashians have to kiss his butt so he’ll call their dysfunctional squabbles no “big deal.”

Look at Kim serving up food at the LA Mission. Jennifer Love Hewitt does this every single year. Credit: WENN

You have read this article with the title Cele|bitchy. You can bookmark this page URL http://thisgirlreprobate.blogspot.com/2011/11/celebitchy.html. Thanks!
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...